Corpus Christi is in danger of a potential water emergency. The eighth-largest city in Texas is currently on track to dry up its reservoirs, which would leave citizens, industries and businesses without water. Analysts say the costs could lead to a multibillion-dollar economic crisis.
The government has responded to the crisis by implementing stringent measures on its residents, such as prohibiting them from watering their lawns. Instead of forcing measures onto innocent citizens, the government should take the initiative to cut down its own use.
The Corpus Christi City Council, which met in March to assess the situation, declared that to avoid the water crisis, the city must reduce 25% of its water expenditures. In pursuit of this goal, the city is ordering everyone to make sacrifices, including residents.
To avoid a “level one” water emergency, the city is both siphoning water from outside sources and prohibiting certain uses for residential water usage.
Prohibited actions include washing cars with residents’ own water, watering lawns and refilling public pools.
It’s unfair that residents must limit their water usage even though they’re not the ones causing it; large projects can’t hold a candle to industrial water usage.
City pools consume two million gallons of water over an entire summer. In comparison, a single Exxon plastics plant consumes 13 million gallons in a single day.
The city is a hub for petrochemicals and refineries, and its rise was facilitated by the demand for its industry. However, it has come at a cost; its plants drain billions of gallons of water from the already vulnerable Lake Texana.
While it is true that corporations use most of the water, that 25% is a flat rate to be shared equally, which means that individual citizens and corporations will both be required to cut the same 25% amount of water spending.
At first glance, it might seem strange that everyone is required to cut the same 25% of their water usage, as many businesses consume billions while residents consume only millions.
At least from the industry’s view, there is a good reason that they cannot drastically cut their water expenditures. As they rely on a stable, steady flow of water, Corpus Christi’s chemical plants, refineries and other industrial facilities risk safety issues if their water supply is cut.
Corpus Christi is a major U.S. industrial hub and port. Slowing down heavy industry could have catastrophic economic consequences, leading to unemployment for the workers of the plants and wider-reaching consequences for the U.S. economy.
This calls into question why these extremely demanding plants were set up in the first place. Despite multiple warnings from scientists and a history of drought, the city continued to hand over contracts for Exxon and Shell plants. Its behavior suggests that the council is not taking the ecological effects seriously.
Because of the city council’s mistakes, the consequences ultimately fall on the average person. Industries have been structured in a way that taxing them risks both safety and economic meltdowns.
The responsibility for saving water falls most heavily on the working-class residents, who are those who have the least political leverage, have no multimillion-dollar contracts with the city and won’t endanger the local economy if their water usage is cut.
Unfortunately, the water emergency in Corpus Christi is less of an isolated problem and more reflective of how climate change is handled across the U.S. – as a low-priority concern, and one where responsibility for it is scarcely placed on the industries that drive the problem.
The largest AI data centers currently sap billions of gallons of water across the U.S. alone, putting vulnerable freshwater at risk.
Federal legislation regarding its usage is rare, and the current administration has shown no signs of addressing the matter.
Instead of governments legislating decisively regarding climate change, the American citizen, like in Corpus Christi, is expected to somehow play a vital role in solving these issues. The average person is encouraged to save water and energy through small actions like not leaving the sink running too long. In Corpus Christi, residents are already partially restricted from access to water.
The general populace should not have to deal with the problems that industry and administrative mistakes have caused.
This is not a defense of individual people who actively pollute the environment, but a warning that the government must address this issue immediately without shirking responsibility from industries.
If left unregulated, crises like Corpus Christi’s will become the norm and the burden of dealing with the crises will keep falling onto those least responsible for them.
